Video: Real Estate Photographer That is Using Fotello for 80% of Listings

WGAN Forum Founder and Advisor 32.55K Website Atlanta, Georgia Linked In Facebook Twitter YouTube TikTok Instragram Matterport Service Partner Google Street View Trusted Photographer Zillow Certified Photographer We Get Around Network Member	32.55K DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	Fotello is a We Get Around Network Marketing Partner --- Video: How to Edit HDR Real Estate Photos with AI \| Faster, Better & Cheaper \| Video courtesy of FullTimeREP YouTube Channel \| 18 September 2025 www.WGAN.info/fotello Video: Real Estate Photographer That is Using Fotello for 80% of Listings Hi All, Fotello is better, faster and cheaper for most real estate photographers that are outsourcing photo editing, says this video from FullTimeREP YouTube Channel. He now uses Fotello for 80 percent or his real estate listings (because Fotello is better, faster and cheaper than his outsourced real estate photo editors. Watch the video (above) to find out why. Chapters Intro 0:00 - 0:51 Processing RAW Photos in Fotello 0:52 - 2:51 Ai Editing Advantages 2:52 - 3:44 Ai Editing Issues 3:45 - 4:19 Post Processing in Fotello 4:20 - 5:48 Fotello CRM Features 5:49 - 6:15 Pros of Ai Editing 6:16 - 6:48 Cost of Ai Editing vs Outsource 6:49 - 7:27 Why I Still Outsource Sometimes 7:28 - 8:00 Closing Thoughts 8:01 - 8:16 Claim 15 FREE Listing Credits with Fotello 8:17 - 8:26 Subscribe! 8:27 - 8:36 Source: FullTimeREP YouTube Channel Best, Dan P.S. Free! 25 Listings - with up to 60 Photos Each when you subscribe to any paid Fotello plan. Either use this WGAN affiliate link for Fotello or say "WGAN" when you talk with a Fotello rep.
	7 months ago	Post 1 • IP flag post

I disagree that it is better or cheaper. But let's start with FASTER. If it gets it right, it can be faster, however I've had jobs where over half the images had problems. Unlike. human editor, where I can email with a screenshot and a few notes, I now have to make individual notes on 30 photos without the ability to send a notated screenshot. 8 hours later they have updated with substandard "fixes". Their support offered to assist in these cases but in practice was not very helpful.

Better? No. It's very good with ideal conditions, but a common problem is wall color confusion. From one angle, the colors might be ok, but the same room from another angle and it makes 1 wall an entirely different color. Another common issue is yellow/orange interior lights are often corrected on the walls but not corrected on the floors.

Cheaper? No, it's not. The subscription model is based on 60 images at $20/job. That's not bad, but how about jobs with 20 photos? Still $20! That's $1 per photo. It is possible to get the same quality and better consistency for 40 cents an image with human editors.

I want to like this and I hope it gets better, but so far I've been disappointed with the quality issues and the pricing feels like I'm getting scammed. For now, I find it useful for jobs that need a fast turnaround and don't care about color accuracy.

118	118 vrephoto private msg quote post Address this user	plus 1 plus 1 plus 1 0
	I disagree that it is better or cheaper. But let's start with FASTER. If it gets it right, it can be faster, however I've had jobs where over half the images had problems. Unlike. human editor, where I can email with a screenshot and a few notes, I now have to make individual notes on 30 photos without the ability to send a notated screenshot. 8 hours later they have updated with substandard "fixes". Their support offered to assist in these cases but in practice was not very helpful. Better? No. It's very good with ideal conditions, but a common problem is wall color confusion. From one angle, the colors might be ok, but the same room from another angle and it makes 1 wall an entirely different color. Another common issue is yellow/orange interior lights are often corrected on the walls but not corrected on the floors. Cheaper? No, it's not. The subscription model is based on 60 images at $20/job. That's not bad, but how about jobs with 20 photos? Still $20! That's $1 per photo. It is possible to get the same quality and better consistency for 40 cents an image with human editors. I want to like this and I hope it gets better, but so far I've been disappointed with the quality issues and the pricing feels like I'm getting scammed. For now, I find it useful for jobs that need a fast turnaround and don't care about color accuracy.
	7 months ago	Post 2 • IP flag post

Video: Real Estate Photographer That is Using Fotello for 80% of Listings21172